Some feel that individuals should try to assimilate completely to the country where they live while others feel it is more important to preserve their native culture. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

While it is true that some would argue that citizens should adapt their lives to the new

place

, others argue that preserving their own traditions should be mandatory.

This

essay will

first

explore both sides and

finally

, I will share my point of view. To start with, it is generally accepted that the assimilation of the new country and its culture makes the integration process smooth. What I mean by

this

is that

life

would have run easily in a

place

in which there are no marked differences. From learning the new language to celebrating the new festivities there are a bunch of activities that make people feel part of the new

place

. One clear example of

this

could be seen in the enormous amount of Erasmus students that each year adapt their routines to the host country. On the opposite side, others prioritize keeping their own original habits and traditions.

This

is due to the fact that these citizens want to feel that they continue developing their previous

life

in the new

place

. Being surrounded by homologues to preserve their culture make these individuals feel less isolated.

For instance

, there are several communities formed by Arabic humans in London that only have contact with their own members. Through

this

unique way of living, they will assure to preserve their own tradition

although

they are miles away from home. To sum up, some people think that the best way to live in a foreign country is assimilating it entirely. While others

on the contrary

argue that preserving their own traditions overseas would help them to develop a new

life

. In my opinion, people should approach their new

life

by assimilating the new culture. Not only does it involves learning the new language but

also

it passing through the celebration of the new festivities