Some people believe that the latest technology is creating a divide between rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Certain individuals argue that the greatest method to resolve environmental programs is to raise the price of gasoline for vehicles and other machines. In my opinion, I partially agree with the given statement and I will elaborate on it in

this

essay. On the one hand, nowadays, the majority of individuals own cars powered by fossil fuels. Because many folks believe their cars offer greater comfort compared to public

transportation

.

As a result

, a significant number of people are indifferent to rising fuel costs.

For example

, in 2021, Ukraine and Russia started a war and

as a result

, global oil prices dramatically increased and affected all the nations.

Moreover

, oil prices in each nation surged significantly but, most communities still

use

their car and there is no noticeable change has occurred in environmental initiatives.

On the other hand

, when gasoline costs get higher, some people

use

public

transportation

, because of their salary. Nearly, all communities’ salaries remained largely unchanged but,

overall

consumer expenses surged so they decided to

use

public

transportation

.

For instance

, In South Korea, the fuel cost was nearly 1 dollar but, recently, it has escalated to 2 or 3 dollars.

Consequently

, the majority of citizens opt for trains and buses for their commute

instead

of personal vehicles

thus

the amount of emissions is a little reduced which leads to good effects on our environment. In conclusion, I in part agree with

this

statement. If the government raises fuel costs some mankind do not care

conversely

, some communities think about the environment and

use

more

transportation

. So, raising the oil price is not a better solution, we should try to

use

alternative energy for cars and that will be good not only for our world but

also

for the earth.