Many manufactured food and drinks contain high level of sugars which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?

Processed foods and beverages laden with significant

sugar

levels pose a threat to human well-being.

While

it is argued that escalating the

prices

of these products could dissuade people from consuming excess

sugar

, I vehemently disagree with

this

proposal, citing concerns over its economic impact on the food industry and the encroachment on individual freedom and choice. To commence, a surge in the costs of sugary goods would undoubtedly carry severe economic repercussions.

This

hike in

prices

could engender far-reaching consequences, particularly impacting sectors like the food industry. The potential fallout,

such

as increased unemployment rates in jobs reliant on the production of these items, is a considerable concern.

For instance

, the closure of numerous bakery factories could become a stark reality as consumers grapple with the financial strain imposed by elevated fees for products like cakes.

In addition

to the economic conundrum, I contend that

such

a measure is a form of paternalism, impinging on personal autonomy. Elevating the

prices

of sugary items could disproportionately affect individuals with lower incomes, exacerbating societal inequalities.

This

approach might inadvertently deepen the socioeconomic divide. Contrary to proponents who argue that higher

prices

serve as a decisive deterrent,

this

perspective fails to consider critical nuances, most notably the socio-economic disparities within society. The idea of universally deterring

sugar

consumption through price hikes does not account for the financial constraints faced by individuals with lower incomes. In conclusion,

while

acknowledging the health concerns associated with excessive

sugar

intake, the proposition to make sugary products more expensive as a deterrent is a problematic solution. The potential economic fallout and the infringement on individual freedoms should prompt us to seek alternative, more balanced approaches to promote healthier dietary choices.