Some believe that students should learn a language very early in school while others think these subjects should be taught later. discuss bothe sides and give your opinion.

Some argue that undergraduates need to start learning a

language

at an early age

while

others disagree.

This

essay will discuss both views and suggest my opinion in favour of the former. On the one hand, learning a

language

when pupils are too young is disadvantageous as it brings confusion to them. To illustrate, a well-known linguistic research centre in England revealed that offsprings of multicultural parents often struggle with

language

degradation. To be specific, only a small minority of these children successfully became bilingual and almost 85% of them became less fluent in both their mother's and father's

language

.

Thus

, teaching a

language

at

children's

Change noun form

an

show examples

early age is not helpful regarding fluency.

On the other hand

, the advocates of early linguistic education argue that young individuals are more flexible and open-minded when it comes to accepting linguistic skills and

thus

they easily excel in

this

field.

For example

, a notable study conducted by Korea University revealed that people who cultivated English skills under 5 years old showed outstanding linguistic abilities, especially in pronunciation and listening in South Korea.

Moreover

, they were more likely to gain new exotic vocabulary knowledge effectively than those who first learned English after entering middle school. Indeed, being exposed to a

language

early is highly considerable. In my opinion, I believe that pupils should start learning at an early age. It is undeniable that youngsters are more likely to develop verbal abilities effectively when they learn a

language

earlier.

To conclude

, there is a controversy about when should children start engaging in

language

classes.

However

, I think early

language

education is totally significant.