In the age of digital communication and social media, face-to-face interactions are becoming less common. Some people think that this is decreasing people’s ability to communicate well in person. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
Today social networking sites are an integral part of human lives. These receive an overwhelming response from netizens
as a result
face-to-face interactions are becoming less common. Many humans believe that this
will dwindle the ability to effectively communicate in person. In this
essay, I will discuss why I disagree with the aforementioned notion.
Excessive use of digital communication
tools
leads to ineffective communication
. Numerous cases are reported by the victims when people face dilemmas to converse properly. It is found that their screen time is way higher, particularly when utilizing social sites, but these are exceptional cases and can not be considered as a precedent. For instance
, a case study carried out by the University of Peshawar students illustrates that only 1 per cent of cases where people have speech challenges are related to those who spend extended hours in front of screens to talk with the community. Thus
, virtual applications deteriorate communication
in person and are totally a baseless idea.
Conversely
, digital solutions are vital for interactive conversations both physically and virtually. Organisations are opting for these after observing an increase in productivity at the workplace. For example
, organisations were occasionally using digital communication
tools
before the coronavirus. When the pandemic broke across the world, businesses took these tools
into consideration and it was found that they were missing something impressive which can contribute a lot to narrowing down the gap between workforce at the workplace either way. Hence
, these tools
are rather much more productive for intellectual discourse.
In conclusion, this
essay discusses, that even though sometimes people may hesitate to talk in person due to
heavily relying on social sites, these are quite handy in terms of productivity. I entirely disagree that these can affect our communication
skills.Submitted by kashikaranti on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
More varied sentence structures and transitions could enhance your essay's flow and readability. Practice using a mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences to convey your ideas more dynamically.
task achievement
To strengthen your arguments, consider providing more diversified and detailed examples across a wider range of contexts. This could help illustrate your points more convincingly.
introduction
Your introduction effectively sets up the essay topic and your stance. For a stronger impact, consider a more compelling hook or a more nuanced thesis statement that acknowledges potential counterarguments.
supported main points
While you've done a good job providing examples to support your points, striving for deeper analysis and explanation of these examples will enhance the persuasiveness of your argument. Consider unpacking the examples further and exploring their implications in more detail.
logical structure
You have a good structure, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, each supporting your main argument, and a conclusion that summarizes your viewpoints.
complete response
Your essay presents a clear stance from the beginning and maintains it consistently throughout, which is essential for task achievement.
relevant specific examples
You made effective use of real or hypothetical examples to support your main points, which adds credibility to your arguments.